Spot delivery risk signals, before they become incidents.
"without disrupting the day-to-day work of your engineers"
Know what's changing, what needs attention, and why delivery slows using real-time signals and on-demand or scheduled reports prompted in human language.
Everything you need to manage your engineering teams
From natural language queries to raw SQL access, Warestack gives you full control over your development data.
Describe what you want to analyze and we'll generate a custom report
Weekly PR Analysis
WeeklySummary of pull request activity and review times
Deployment Metrics
DailyTrack deployment frequency and success rates
Team Performance
MonthlyIndividual and team contribution analytics
Stop context-switching between GitHub, Jira, Linear, and Slack. Warestack builds a unified lineage for every PR with metadata, associations, and behavioral patterns—queryable with SQL or natural language.
Enrich with behavioral pattern metadata
Warestack doesn't just store events—it enriches them with behavioral patterns, associations, and computed metrics like cycle time, review velocity, and deployment frequency.
{
"pull_request": {
"id": "PR-4832",
"title": "feat: add auth middleware",
"author": "mary@acme.com",
"status": "merged",
"created_at": "2025-10-12T09:14:00Z",
"merged_at": "2025-10-14T11:30:00Z"
},
"warestack_metadata": {
"cycle_time_hours": 50.3,
"review_rounds": 2,
"linked_issue": "LIN-294",
"deployment_id": "deploy-9821",
"first_review_at": "2025-10-12T14:22:00Z",
"team": "backend",
"patterns": ["security-change", "large-diff"]
}
}Checks & agreements that guide your team
- PR diff = Linear scope
Why Warestack?
Monitor DevOps processes, not just errors—with context-aware governance.
| Feature | Warestack | AI code review tools | GitHub (native features) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Process monitoring (How, Why, When) | Tracks DevOps processes—how changes were made, why decisions were made, and under what conditions. Links PR → review → deployment → incident chains. | Focus on individual PRs; no cross-event correlation or workflow context. | Tracks what changed (code, metadata); no process context or post-merge chain linking. |
| Explainability | Deterministic checks + evidence recorded on PRs/issues. | Opaque AI responses; difficult to trace why suggestions were made. | No built-in explainable policy engine. |
| Human-language queries | Search and ask in plain English across PR history. | Limited query capabilities; typically focused on current PR only. | No query layer. |
| Context-aware rule enforcement | Adaptive rules that consider developer role, timing, and team context. Enforce based on real-world conditions, not just binary checks. | Provide suggestions and comments; cannot enforce or block merges. | Binary branch protection (yes/no); cannot adapt to context like developer seniority or deployment timing. Protection rules end at merge button. |
| Operational agents (Slack/Linear) | Post actionable comments into Linear and Slack with context. | Basic notifications; limited integration with workflow tools. | Notification-only. |
| Centralized audit trail | Centralized evidence trails with full context—who violated what rule, when, why, and what it impacted. SOC-2 ready workflows. | Limited audit trails; difficult to prove why decisions were made. | No centralized audit bundle across tools; violations scattered across repos. |